A new camera for beginners

A new type of camera that’s designed to be used for “low-intensity” video is available in the United States, and it’s being marketed as the Axon body cameras.

The Axon camera is designed to offer a much simpler interface than some of the other cameras on the market, and offers wireless hidden camera functionality.

“The Axon is a wireless hidden cam that’s a much more accessible camera interface than a camera with a video button,” wrote Axon Camera’s co-founder and CEO Scott Mott.

Mott’s company has sold tens of thousands of Axon cameras over the years, including for a variety of uses.

The camera is equipped with an LED light that’s mounted on the side of the camera.

When a button is pressed, the camera switches on, and you can use it as a remote control for your smartphone.

The only way to connect to the camera is to plug it in.

Axon has partnered with a number of manufacturers, including the San Francisco Bay Area tech company Digi-Key, for the camera, and also with Panasonic, Canon, Sony, Nikon, and more.

The company has not yet announced pricing or availability.

The cameras come in three colors: black, white, and red.

They weigh in at 1.2 pounds and 1.8 ounces, respectively.

Motti said the company is working with several different manufacturers to get them ready for mass production.

The price for the Axons will be $199.99, or about $200 less than the $349.99 price of the company’s existing cameras.

“We’re trying to find the right balance between being able to have a low price and also being able it’s affordable,” Motti told Ars.

“Our goal is to be able to offer it to a lot of users that might not be able, say, to a $350 camera, or a $500 camera.”

Motti expects the company to start selling the cameras to customers in the next six to 12 months.

The first batch of the cameras is expected to be available by the end of March.

The product is being marketed to users interested in getting a more “personal” experience with their smartphone camera.

“People want to be comfortable and have an option that they can control remotely,” Mott said.

“They want to have the flexibility to turn on the camera in the middle of a game or a game session, and still have that option of turning it off at the end if it’s not necessary.”

Mott and his team are also hoping to sell the camera for around $200 to $300, depending on how much it costs to get it set up and to get the accessories and software they’re offering.

“It’s not just about the camera,” Motto said.

But it’s still a “tough market to be in.”

Motto’s Axon product is not the first camera to offer remote control functionality.

The makers of the popular Garmin Navi wireless cameras have a similar feature, and some of their models also feature built-in cameras for controlling devices.

Motto is also partnering with GoPro for a camera called the Gobi Camera that also offers remote control.

It’s currently available for $199 for a smartphone.

Motsa also partnered with DigiKey, Canon and Sony to build the camera that is currently being marketed by Axon.

Mitzi said the Axo camera is a bit different in that the company doesn’t need to use a dedicated remote control to turn the camera on and off.

The phone itself also doesn’t have a remote.

Instead, the Axone is able to be connected via Bluetooth to a Bluetooth-enabled mobile device, like an iPad or an iPhone.

Mello said the camera uses infrared, and is able the remote-control functions through Bluetooth.

“You can get the camera and control it through the IR,” Mello explained.

The new Axon video camera is expected for a late-2019 launch.

MotoGuru readers have mixed feelings about the cameras capabilities.

While the Axondes remote controls are great, they aren’t the best remote control on the scene.

They’re not as customizable as some of Google’s other products, like the Google Glasses or Amazon Echo.

The feature-set is a little lacking, as well.

You’ll have to make sure you’re using a remote that has an IR sensor, for example, to control the camera when it’s in range of your eyes.

While I don’t have an issue with the cameras ability to control cameras remotely, it does feel a little less customizable.

There’s a good chance you’ll have trouble controlling cameras on your own if you’re trying a remote-controlled product like the Apple Watch or Amazon Alexa, for instance.

If you want to control a camera on your iPhone, you’ll need a third-party remote control app.

It may take some time to get these cameras in users hands, but